What did Carlo earn?

Carlo Catani was an extraordinarily busy man as Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department of Victoria and his design and engineering skills were much in demand, so what did he earn for all this work? Well, it turns out that he just got the normal Victorian Public Service salary.

The Age reported on February 25, 1910 that at a meeting of the Executive Council held yesterday, Mr. C. Catani, engineer-of roads, bridges and harbor works, was promoted to be chief engineer of the Public Works department. His present salary is £600 a year. Class B 2, to which he has been raised, carries a salary ranging from a minimum of £560 to a maximum of £650.

The Age February 25, 1910.

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article196082294

So it appears that officers in Class B 2, could be paid as much as £650 per annum, but The Argus on the same day said that  Carlo's appointment came with  a salary of £600 a year and that No increase was made in Mr. Catani's salary, so he had taken on additional responsibilities for no extra money.

Carlo must have eventually had a salary increase as Punch reported on October 24, 1912 on some political gossip about the appointment of the new Agent-General in London and  Other important State appointments are contingent on the carrying of the Main Roads Bill this session. The Chairman of the Main Roads Board is to receive £800 a year. He will almost certainly be Mr. Catani, who has been thinking out the engineering problems of the Public Works Department for many years, and yet gets only £650 a year, a remuneration which the average successful engineer in private practice would scorn. But that is the way with Victorian Governments. They stop short with their salaries for just those valuable expert officers whose brain work means success or disaster to the State's largest public undertakings. Ministers get so little themselves - only from £1000 to £1200 - that they cannot see that it pays the public to pay handsomely for the best expert knowledge.

From this we learn that Carlo was now on £650 per annum, the maximum for Class B 2 Public Servant; that Government Ministers earnt between £1000 to £1200;  that Carlo should have been paid more and the Punch considered that he would be a suitable Chairman  of the Main Roads Board, which paid £800 per annum. Did Carlo ever apply for the Chairman's role? Returning to Punch, in January 1913 they reported that he had declined the position. It may have been because his own position was reclassified in late 1912 and that his salary increased to around £800 per annum (Bendigo Independent).   In the end the organization was known as the Country Roads Board and the first chairman was William Calder (1860 - 1928).  The Calder Highway is named for Mr Calder and you can read his entry in the Australian Dictionary of Biography, here.

Punch October 24, 1912

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article175803175

When the role of Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department was created the role of Chief Architect was also created. The Herald of May 4, 1910 reported that Lieutenant-Colonel G. W. Watson, a senior architect of the Public Works Department, has been appointed Chief Architect of that Department at a salary of £560 a year.  This was £40 per annum less than Carlo. Was Lieutenant-Colonel George William Watson worried about this? Don't know, but he sadly died in July 1915 and Samuel Charles Brittingham was appointed acting Chief Architect. Due to the War no permanent appointments were being made. Mr Brittingham retired in 1922.

Of course, we do not know how Carlo spent his money, but he obviously used some of it to support community groups and works in St Kilda. This article, below, published after he died, said that he had voluntarily worked for St Kilda Foreshore Committee for 12 years and had even lent the group  £1,400 to  help it continue it work - that's two years worth of salary - a generous amount of money.  Carlo did not leave a will but his probate papers valued his estate at just over £3,645 - £1,448 in real estate and £2,245 in personal property.

Carlo's generosity. The memorials to Carlo came  a bit later - the gardens designed by Carlo on the St Kilda foreshore were named after him in 1927 and the Memorial Clock Tower was unveiled in 1932.

Prahran Telegraph  August 17, 1918

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article75258567

An article published in The Age of November 25, 1925 was scathing in reporting this matter, of Carlo having to lend money to the Foreshore Committee in order that they could carry out their beautification works.

A report mentioned Carlo's generous loan to the St Kilda Foreshore Committee. Sadly, the reported  short sighted, unenterprising state of mind that existed in the Government at the time, still exists in Governments today - so no change there.
The Age of November 25, 1925
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article155677079

To put these salaries that I have mentioned above into perspective the 1915 Commonwealth Year* book has lists of average wages for the time and a metal worker such as a blacksmith earnt about £170 per annum and and a general labourer about £124. A male shop assistant or clerk was on £91 to £130 and a female on £54 to £78. Clearly, compared to the average man in the street, Carlo was doing well, however given the massive contribution that he made to Victoria and the esteem and affection with which he was held then  I must agree with the Punch writer that They [the Victorian Government] stop short with their salaries for just those valuable expert officers whose brain work means success or disaster to the State's largest public undertakings. 

* Access the Commonwealth Year books, here. Click on Past & Future releases.

I have created  a list of articles on Trove about Carlo's salary - access it here. All articles referenced here are on the list.

Carlo's patriotism is called into question

Did Carlo experience any discrimination due to his Italian background?  His Italian birth didn't seem to have any negative effect on his career and it does appear that he was well liked by many Victorians, who viewed him with much affection and respect. But I did come across this article where an 'unpleasant incident' occurred and his patriotism during the First World War was called into question at a public meeting, which seemed a bit ironic as Italy was on 'our' side during the War.

This article is from The Age of July 26, 1916. You can read the full article here

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/155161971

AN UNPLEASANT INCIDENT
Addressing a meeting of about 200 public servants outside the Government Printing Office yesterday, Mr J. W. Billson, M.L.A., member of the State Parliamentary Recruiting Committee, made an earnest appeal for co-operation and assistance in the flotation of the new war loan. Mr W. Cattanach, chairman of the State Rivers and Walter Supply Commission, presided. The meeting was marked by an unpleasant incident, in which the central figures were Mr C. Catani, Chief Engineer, and Mr. Kerrigan, an official in the Treasury department. At the conclusion of Mr. Billson's speech, the chairman asked those present if they desired any information regarding the loan.
Mr Kerrigan: Yes, I want to ask a question. Do you think the stoppage of increments* by the Victorian Government is likely to increase the sale of bonds  (Cries of 'Don't answer him' and uproar, in which a voice was heard, 'Put him out.')
Mr Kerrigan (moving towards the crowd): Who said 'Put him out'? Who said 'Put him out'?
Mr C. Catani (stepping forward): 'I said 'Put him out!'
Mr Kerrigan: Oh, you, you're a foreigner. (Uproar)
Mr Catani: I am not a foreigner. I have a son fighting for us. He's over in France now - fighting for you and me. You are a cur!
Mr Catani's voice was scarcely audible above the uproar. Several of those present assumed a threatening attitude towards Mr Kerrigan, and one gentleman planted himself in front of that official in the 'shaping-up' attitude. For a moment it seemed as if the advice of Mr. Catani was to be put into practical effect, but the chairman called the attention of the meeting  back to the speaker, and the incident passed off. Mr. Billson said he refused to answer a question which he considered invaded political ground. 'I ask you to help us to beat the Germans,' he added, 'and then you can fight your own battles and divide the spoils'.

This is a precis of the rest of the article -  Mr. Billson, in the course of his remarks, went onto to say that provision needed to be made for the payment of 300,000 troops abroad  and the pensions of the dependants of those who had been killed, they also had to provide ammunition and equipment and this was at a cost of one million pounds per week, plus the normal expenditure for the government which meant 1,500,000 pounds was needed per week.....To do that he was appealing to them to do their utmost, according to their means, to help in the flotation of the new war loan. ......The war loan was a good investment, and they could not get a better. He appealed to them with confidence to help the Federal Government to make the flotation of the loan a success. A resolution was then put by the chairman that the meeting support in every manner possible the flotation of the war loan, and this was carried with enthusiasm.
.
Mr J. W. Billson was John William Billson (1862 - 1924), Member for Fitzroy and at one time Deputy Leader of the Labour Party- read about him here in the Australian Dictionary of Biography.
Mr W. Cattanach was William Cattanach (1863 - 1932) who was appointed to the newly created State Rivers & Water Supply Commission in 1906 and became Chairman in 1915. You can read more about him in the Australian Dictionary of Biography, here.
I don't know anything else about Mr Kerrigan.

*An announcement made in June 1916  that Public Servants over and above a certain Grade (earning £336 per annum) would not receive their normal increments such as the yearly increases they receive whilst advancing through their class or grade and their end of band payments. Read about it here - perhaps Mr Kerrigan was one of those who would miss out on this increment.