Saturday, November 12, 2022

Richard Fiddes Brown (1876-1936)

Carlo Catani retired from the Public Works Department on April 28, 1917, the day he turned 65. Subsequently on May 9, at the Lands Department,  Sir Alex Peacock, Premier of Victoria, presented Carlo with a magnificent illuminated address as a token of our pleasant association with you. The illuminated address was the work of Richard Fiddes Brown, of Messrs. Mason, Firth & McCutcheon, a printing, lithography and publishing firm, established in the 1870s (1).  

The illuminated address, which is now held by the State Library of Victoria, was bound in morocco leather and had the signatures of the Premier, members of the Cabinet, heads of all departments, and officers of the Public Works Department. There were also views of  the Governments’ Public Offices at 2 Treasury Place, where Catani was based and views  of some of his major projects and sites: Alexandra Avenue, the Yarra River Improvements, Eurobin Falls, and Lake Catani. 


Carlo Catani's Illuminated farewell address  - the work of Richard Fiddes Brown.
State Library of Victoria Manuscripts collection. Image: Isaac Hermann.

Carlo Catani's Illuminated farewell address - the signatures of the Politicians
 and Public Servants.
State Library of Victoria Manuscripts collection. Image: Isaac Hermann.


Carlo Catani's Illuminated farewell address  - the work of Richard Fiddes Brown. 
Illustrations depict - Governments’ Public Offices at 2 Treasury Place,  Alexandra Avenue and the Yarra River,  Eurobin Falls and Lake Catani. 
State Library of Victoria Manuscripts collection. Image: Isaac Hermann.


It was, perhaps, no coincidence that this firm produced the farewell address as the manager of the firm, Robert George McCutcheon, knew Carlo Catani. McCutcheon was the member of the Legislative Assembly for the seat of St Kilda from 1902 until 1917, and he, along with Carlo, were among the original members of the St Kilda Fore Shore Committee, established in 1906 (2). At a St Kilda Council meeting in May 1917, the Council expressed their appreciation to the recently retired Carlo for his service to St Kilda and the State of Victoria. Both Carlo and Robert McCutcheon were invited guests at the meeting and it was reported that -
Mr. McCutcheon said he was extremely sorry that Mr. Catani had resigned from the public service. He had given magnificent service to the State, and during his long career in the Public Service he had gained the good-will and esteem of all with whom he had come in contact (3).

Richard Fiddes Brown, the talented artist, was born on April 5, 1876 in Oxley near Wangaratta in 1876. He was the third child of  Robert Brown and Dorothy Anne Fiddes, who had married on January 19, 1873. He had six brothers and three sisters. We can track the location of the family from the birth places of the children; Robert Brown was an engine driver, presumably with the Victorian Railways, which may explain why they moved around so much. The next child after Richard was born in Barnawartha;  the following three in Malmsbury from 1880 to 1884; and the last three were born in Richmond from 1887 to 1893. It is therefore likely that Richard attended school in Malmsbury and finished his schooling in Richmond. He possibly then started an apprenticeship with Mason, Firth & McCutcheon or a similar firm (4). 

Richard was married to Florence Edith Brown on November 18, 1902 at St Johns Church of England, which was in La Trobe Street, Melbourne by the Reverend Cadwalader Pierce Thomas.  Flora was 29 years old, born in Sydney and the daughter of Charles and Mary (nee Orkney) Brown.  Their daughter Marjorie Fiddes Brown was born in 1904 in Brunswick and a son Stewart Fiddes Brown in 1906 in South Melbourne. The 1913 to 1919 Electoral Rolls show the family were living in Northcote; during the 1920s they were in Canterbury and in the 1930s in Camberwell. In spite of the fact that he was clearly a skilled artist, his occupation throughout the years was that of a traveller (salesman). (5)

The first reference I can find to Richard's community activities is in 1902 when he was listed as the Secretary of the Executive Committee of the local M.H.R, James Hume Cook, who as a member of the Protectionist Party, represented the Bourke Electorate from 1901 until 1910.  Hume Cook had previously been a member of the Legislative Assembly in Victoria from 1894 until 1900 and was also a president of the Australian Natives' Association (A.N.A.) (6). Fiddes Brown was one of  Hume Cook's groomsmen when he married Miss Nellie Maine at the Brunswick Presbyterian Church in March 1902. One of Nellie's bridesmaid was Florence Brown, the future wife of Fiddes Brown. I wonder did they know each before they were both members of  the wedding party or is that how they met? A notable guest at the Hume Cook wedding was the Prime Minister,  Edmund Barton. (7).

Fiddes Brown shared with Hume Cook an involvement with the A.N.A.  The A.N.A was a Friendly Society, established in Victoria in 1871, and open to Australian born or 'native' men to promote and protect Australian interests, to promote the social and intellectual improvement of members and to provide medical benefits - such as the attendance of a Doctor when required, sick pay when ill and death benefits to the wife on the death of a member. It also banned any discussion of religion or an allusion calculated to excite sectarian feeling (8).

J.E. Menadue, in his history of the A.N.A., (9)  notes Fiddes Brown's involvement as -
a member of the Brunswick Branch and was Assistant Secretary and President of the Branch. He was Chairman of the Metropolitan Committee in 1917 and 1918. It was the first time anyone had been Chairman for the second time. He was also a member of the Board of Directors (1917-1919) and a delegate to Annual Conference for 15 years.

Menadue also lists another achievement of Fiddes Brown -
[to him] goes the honour that as a result of an interview with Mr F. Tate, Director of Education, Victoria it was decided that the Australian Flag, and not the Union Jack, was to be saluted at Australian ceremonies.

Richard Fiddes Brown, on his election to the President of the Working Men's College

In January 1915, Fiddes Brown, was elected as the Vice-President of the Working Men's College (later to become the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology) and two years later he was appointed the President (10).1917 was indeed a busy time for Fiddes Brown as The Herald noted -
As president of the Working Men's College Council for 1917 and chairman of the Metropolitan Board of the Australian Natives' Association, Mr. Brown's spare time this year will be well occupied. (11). Added to these roles was the creation of Carlo's illuminated retirement address, presented in the May.

Fiddes Brown clearly had an interest in Technical education and in August 1917 he presented a lecture on the subject at the Glen Huntly Hall. Some of the more interesting parts of his speech are transcribed here (you can read his full speech in the Cheltenham Seaside News, here)
Technical education, he said, was one of the most important questions of the day.... In Victoria there is no systematic method of finding out what calling a lad is adapted for, and the worst instance of improper selection is found to be in the parents themselves. In giving examples of this, he referred to five callers recently at the Working Men's College. Each parent wanted his boy to be an Electrical engineer or a mechanical engineer. In many instances owing to faulty selections, boys are being put to trades for which they are unsuitable, and frequently after two years work it is found that the boy's time, and the parents money had been wasted.

When the war was over they would have a hard trade war, and workmen could not compete unless they attended technical schools and were given the necessary training. New South Wales were spending £2,500,000 on education, whilst Victoria spent £1,500,000. Mention had been made of an effort to secure a technical  school in Caulfield, and he would, urge that a site be selected which would permit of room for expansion. It is absolutely essential that the land be sufficiently large to provide for additions, as taking the other suburbs such as Brunswick, the day the school opened it would be filled. The Australian can hold his own against any race in the world. He is quick and smart to pick up a thing, and you will find that many high positions are held by those who have been students at the Working Men's Collage. The British monitors doing such fine work in this war were designed by an ex-student of the Working Men's College, and the automatic firing, which was fitted up in the trenches at Gallipoli to delude the Turks during the evacuation, was an invention of an ex-student of the same college. The man who is technically trained is better equipped to fight than he would be otherwise.

On the question of repatriation much good work has been done by the college in training returned soldiers in the work of boat clicking and in this the State War council has given great help and up to date eighty men have been trained and enabled to take up work, earning £3 per week and giving satisfaction to the employer and employee alike. Wool sorting has also been taken up and the men after selection some eight months ago have been trained and fifty of these have started work for this wool season. The others now being trained will take up the work next year. Toy-making at the Collingwood school has also been successful notwithstanding reports to the contrary (12).


The dapper Richard Fiddes Brown on the left  with Mr M. Devine at the A.N.A fete in Janaury 1919
The Australasian, February 1, 1919 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article140218074

Scouting was another activity in which Fiddes Brown took an interest.  In August 1918 it was reported that -
The dinner arranged by the Scout Masters' Association in commemoration of the amalgamation of Baden Powell and Australian Imperial Scout Sections was held at the Cafe Royal on Saturday evening, when 60 Scout Masters, members of the central executive committee and invited guests were present, Brigadier-General Burston occupied the chair and was supported by Mr Fiddes Brown, Mr Coe, chairman of the central executive committee, being unavoidably absent....The function will be long remembered by those who were present (13).

In May 1921,  The new Scout Hall at Blackburn was officially opened on Saturday afternoon. Mr R. Fiddes Brown, chairman of the Headquarters Staff in declaring the hall opened, spoke of the spirit of citizenship displayed by Mr Saunders, who is nearly 80 years of age, and built the hall for the benefit of the Blackburn troop (14). 

There is one more story of Fiddes Brown worth sharing, that of his support for the retention of the Old Melbourne Cemetery. The Age reported on a protest held in 1920 -
Old Melbourne Cemetery. Protest against Desecration
That the opposition to the City Council's proposal to utilise the old cemetery for the extension of the general market adjoining is growing, both as to numbers and influence, was evidenced yesterday, when some hundreds of people assembled at Batman's monument to participate in the annual Foundation day service. Sir John Monash, who presided, laid a tribute to the work of Mr. A. H. Padley and those associated with him for the efforts made to defeat the council's proposal. He said that many of the men who were on active service were, like himself, astounded to learn that such an historic area was to be callously desecrated, and feared that the harm would have been done before they returned. Thanks to Mr. Padley and others this was avoided and the opportunity being afforded him, he intended to do everything possible to bring councillors to see the wrongfulness of what they proposed. (Applause.)

The cemetery, was the most historic and sacred spot in Victoria, and it would be a national crime to destroy it. The very idea of turning it into a vegetable market was revolting, and if carried into effect would prove that the people of Melbourne were utterly devoid of sentiment, and utterly lacking in gratitude to the pioneers who had blazed the trail they were following. (Applause.)

Apart altogether from the sentimental aspect, it would be a great breach of faith, amounting to robbery, to those who had paid for the graves and, the right of their dead to lie in peace for all time, while to do it at a period when they were talking of erecting memorials would be to show themselves a community of hypocrites. (Applause.)

Dr. Springthorpe, in moving a motion of protest, said he would sooner become a carniverous animal and live without vegetables altogether than eat vegetables sold on such a sacred site; a place sanctified by the burial of the first ten thousand of Melbourne's dead. The motion was seconded by Mr. I. Selby, who argued that the cemetery, because of its sacred, historical and democratic associations, was the ideal location of a national memorial to those who fell in the war. Mr Long (Educational department) moved, and Mr. Fiddes Brown (A.N.A.) seconded, that a deputation wait on the Lord Mayor to seek his support in preserving the cemetery. Both motions were unanimously agreed to.
(15)

In spite of the high profile support, the Cemetery was closed and only the marked graves were exhumed and reinterred at other cemeteries. The rest remain buried under the Queen Victoria Market.

As was common in those days, it was the men who were involved in public life, but we do have one reference of Florence Fiddes Brown taking part in a community activity, and it is more than likely she was involved in many other activities. In June 1918, The Herald reported -
When a small hand held out 10/ yesterday to help in the penny offensive at the Town Hall, Mrs R. Fiddes Brown, to whom the money was given, was surprised, and questioned the boy Vernon Hodgson, of The Parade, Ascot Vale. The boy had made £1 by the sale of paper beads which he had made. He gave 10/ to the Comforts Fund and 10/ to his school fund. (16).

Richard and Florence's children both married.  Marjorie was married in 1937 to Joseph  Frances Forster and her death notice in The Age of November 29, 1982 lists five children and sixteen grandchildren.  Stewart married in 1929 to  Evelyn Rosetta Margaret Reaby. He was a Solicitor and they lived in Horsham.  Florence died on July 30, 1929, aged 55 and  Richard died November 13, 1936, aged 60.  They are buried at the Box Hill Cemetery (17).


Acknowledgment - some of this post was written and researched in conjunction with my colleague, Isaac Hermann, and has been published in our Victorian Collections story on Carlo Catani   https://victoriancollections.net.au/stories/carlo-catani-an-engineering-star-over-victoria

Trove list - I have created a short list of articles about Richard Fiddes Brown and his work, personal life, community activities and people he was associated with. Access it here

Footnotes
(1) Report of the presentation - The Herald, May 9, 1917, see here.
(2) Robert George McCutcheon (1841 - 1918) - obituary: The Argus, October 21, 1918, see here; Spectator and Methodist Chronicle, October 23, 1918, see here. St Kilda Fore Shore information - Cooper, John Butler The History of St Kilda from its first settlement to a city and after 1840 - 1930, v. 2 (St Kilda City Council, 1931), p. 204. 
(3) Malvern Standard, May 26, 1917, see here.
(4) Family information - Birth Certificate and Marriage Certificate;  Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages.
(5) More Family information - Marriage certificate; Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages; Electoral Rolls on Ancestry.com
(7) Hume Cook wedding - Punch, March 27, 1902, see here.
(8) Menadue, J.E. A Centenary History of the Australian Natives' Association, 1871-1971 (Horticultural Press, 1971), p. 10.
(9) Menadue, op. cit.
(10) The Age, January 27, 1915, see here.
(11) The Herald, January 27, 1917, see here.
(12) Cheltenham Seaside News, August 25, 1917, see here.
(13) Weekly Times, August 31, 1918, see here.
(14) The Herald, May 23, 1921, see here.
(15) The Age, January 26, 1920, see here.
(16) The Herald, June 25, 1918, see here.
(17) Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages; Family notices in the newspapers.

Thursday, November 10, 2022

Marooned in Mallacoota and the Mallacoota Port Schemes

On Monday, March 3, 1913 the Minister of Public Works, William Edgar; the Honorary Minister, James Cameron; Carlo Catani, chief engineer of the Public Works Department and George Kermode, the assistant engineer, set off for East Gippsland in the State motorcar. They were destined for Mallacoota as -
For a considerable period there has been an agitation that the Department of Public Works should construct a permanent entrance to Mallacoota Inlet at an estimated cost of £60,000. Mr C. Catani, chief engineer for the Department, expressed the opinion that if a harbor were made at Gabo Island, and a connecting causeway constructed with the mainland, the same purpose would be served, while the cost of maintenance, through the liability to silting up of the Mallacoota Inlet would be considerably less. A departmental surveyor has been at work for some time surveying a tram route between Mallacoota and Gabo. Mr Edgar, Minister for Public Works; Mr Catani, and another Public Works official are leaving to-day for Mallacoota to make a complete inspection (1). 

The next day, Tuesday, they arrived in Orbost at 6.45pm. They inspected an island which had formed in the centre of the Snowy River, which impeded water flow,  and later that evening a deputation of councillors waited upon the Ministry at the municipal chambers with a view to getting a new bridge erected over the Snowy River at Orbost, also Bridges over Tonghi Creek and Delegate River and further road works on the Genoa-road (2).  The official party left Orbost on Wednesday for Mallacoota, a distance of 145 km.  The tour, however, was attended by several unexpected incidents which have interfered considerably with the programme of the trip (3). 

Unfortunately the car broke down at a way-back place called Cabbage Tree, as The Argus reported (4). They then continued on horseback to Mallacoota, about 120 km, which seems to me to be an extraordinary thing to do, but clearly at the time not beyond the endurance of Ministers of the Crown and Public Servants. 


A 1940's map of East Gippsland - Orbost, Cabbage Tree and Mallacoota 
are circled in green. Click on map to enlarge. 
The map shows the railway line was through to Orbost, but unfortunately for Carlo 
and his colleagues, the line from Bairnsdale to Orbost did not open until April 1916.
Tourist map Greater Gippsland, Victoria, Australia,  issued by the Victorian Railways Commissioners.
State Library of Victoria  http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/166067


Misfortune befell the party again when they reached Mallacoota where seven inches of rain (5) was reported to have fallen in two days and they were marooned there until the weather improved.


Headline from The Argus of March 10 1913

There was much interest in the papers about their situation and The Herald took a light-hearted view - 
Ministers complain of the stress of work, but excessive work is often brought about by want of thinking beforehand, and so a Minister is much occupied by undoing the work of his predecessor. Mr Edgar at Mallacoota has a fine opportunity for a quiet think, "on man, on nature, and on human life," including the public works of his department. It is rather a pity that Ministers do not get marooned regularly. There ought indeed to be an official island to which Ministers could go every year, for a month or so deprived of all official papers. Its library should consist of the Bible, Shakespeare, one or two more of  "the hundred best books." A stock of fowling pieces, fishing rods, axes, a boat or two, and something equivalent to Friday for a servant might be allowed.... If a man and a Minister could not be happy under such circumstances, then he should for ever hold his peace about the worry of work. He would have no deputations to nag at him, no unfulfillable promises to make, no press or other criticisms to annoy him. From his island home he could see life steadily and see it whole, and recover probably what men in cities so often lose, the power of original thinking. It is gratifying for Victorians, too, to learn that in their small country, sometimes sneered at as a cabbage garden, there is yet ample room and verge enough for isolation for from the madding crowd. Mr Edgar, with his two engineers, returning from the wilds clad in the skins of wallaby, and native bear, will be a concrete proof of this when they land at No. 8 Wharf by the steamer they may catch at Gabo (6). 

The last sentence about the steamer was part of the speculation on how the party would return to Melbourne. It was reported that a telegram has been forwarded by the ports and harbours branch to the lighthouse-keeper on Gabo Island instructing him to keep a look-out for a steamer to bring Mr Edgar and party back to Melbourne (7).

The Herald of March 13,  printed an article on how the official party occupied their time at Mallacoota and how they travelled back to Melbourne - 
To be marooned at Mallacoota, with ample funds in hand is a very pleasurable experience. Mr G Kermode, of the Public Works department, who returned to Melbourne yesterday afternoon, after being weather-bound at the lonely little East Gippsland town for some days, stated that he had never lived more luxuriously. [They] did not mind their "marooning" said Mr Kermode....Fish of many succulent varieties, wild ducks of surprising plumpness, tenderness, and flavour, were freely provided. Garden vegetables and fresh fruits from the orchard (including many tropical varieties) were sampled, and voted "excellent," and by way of dessert there is is always honey in the comb, and rich cream. 

As a set-off to the high living, the company had to endure heavy and continuous showers. In two days over 7in of rain fell. An inspection of the proposed tramway route between Mallacoota and Gabo was made in a "blinding storm," the Ministers and engineers endeavouring to take in the details of the survey whilst they frantically clung to their umbrellas, which showed a reprehensible desire to turn themselves inside out.

On Saturday Mr Cameron and Mr Kermode travelled by motor to Bruthen. "We had to ford numerous creeks and rivers that were swollen by the rains," said Mr. Kermode, and he had frequently to use the axe to clear a path along the tracks. Mr Cameron used the axe like the expert woodsman that he is. It was the intention of Mr. Edgar and Mr Catani to inspect Gabo Island as soon as the weather cleared up sufficiently, and then to return to Melbourne by launch, motor and rail. The launch will take them to Eden, and there they can get a motor-car to take them to Cooma." Mr Edgar is expected to reach Melbourne either late to-night or early tomorrow (8). The last part of the journey from Cooma to Melbourne was by train and the expected arrival of early tomorrow, was Friday March 14, eleven days after they had set off. 


From Mallacoota West looking towards Gabo, 1921. Photographer: John Henry Harvey.
State Library of Victoria Image H90.161/517

The purpose of this trip, which in the end turned into quite an adventure, was to open up this stagnant area, as it was called, by either constructing a permanent entrance to Mallacoota Inlet thus allowing all-year shipping access or else to construct a harbour on Gabo Island and connect the Island to the mainland  by a causeway and a tramline to the causeway. The Age reported in November 1913 under the headline
Mallacoota Port Schemes - Rival Engineering Projects - Extraordinary estimates of cost -
With a greater degree of enthusiasm than it usually displays, the Public Works department is developing its new scheme for the opening up of a harbor at Gabo island, to serve as an outlet for Mallacoota district. This has been put forward as a superior and more economical scheme than the old one, which aimed at the construction of a permanent channel at Mallacoota Inlet. The latter scheme has been in contemplation for some years, and has been made the subject of reports by three or four experts. The Gabo Island proposal, on the other hand, was not heard of until a few months ago, and has not yet been seriously investigated. Nevertheless, the Public Works department, from Minister downwards, seems to have jumped to the conclusion, on very meagre and inconclusive data, that the Gabo Island scheme is superior in respect of cost, permanent suitability and general effectiveness, and the project for the opening of the Inlet is in danger of being shoved aside. There is so far no justification for the abandonment of what has been recommended as a feasible and practical scheme in favor of one which at the present stage cannot reasonably be claimed to be anything more than a visionary project (9). 

The costs were indeed extraordinary and it is worth noting that the investigations into the Mallacoota port had started four years previously in 1909. The Age reported the details and costings of the various schemes for a port at Mallacoota- 
The Public Works department sent Mr. T. H. Smith, marine surveyor, to see what could be done. He reported in May, 1909, that to provide a permanent channel it would be necessary to construct two retaining walls. The project would be started with one wall, at an estimated cost of £25,000, made up of timber viaduct, £8750; rubble wall, £10,000; railway to quarries and contingencies, £6250. Concerning a local suggestion that an ocean jetty should be built in a sheltered spot 350 yards inside Bastion's Point at a cost of £5000, Mr. Smith expressed the opinion that it would not greatly assist the development of the country, as there would be no certainty of regular calls from trading vessels, owing to the reposed nature of the position, and that the frequent handling of freight would be inconvenient and expensive.

Following upon that report Mr. Catani, now Chief Engineer of the Public Works department, submitted for consideration a scheme involving the construction of two groynes and training walls, at an estimated cost of £42,240, to provide a depth of 9 feet at low water. To this Mr. Davidson, Inspector-General of Public Works, appended a note that, with the data available, he did not think a less expensive project was feasible, and it would require the expenditure of about £10,000 additional for wharfage and the deepening of the shipway thereto. At that stage the reports were pigeonholed. 

A year or so later the residents renewed their agitation, and in the early part of 1911 Mr. Kermode, another departmental engineer, was sent to investigate. He recommended the construction of two 500 feet piers to enclose the channel. This, he estimated, would cost £53,000, and provide a channel deep enough for vessels drawing a maximum of 10 feet. 

That report, too, was pigeonholed, and Mr. H. A. Blomfield, a harbor expert in the service of the New South Wales Government, was brought to Victoria at the end of the year to supply another report. The scheme propounded by Mr. Blomfield is much more ambitious, and consequently more expensive, than those of the Victorian engineers. The previous projects had aimed at strengthening the scour from the lake, but he apparently adopted the view that the main consideration should be to protect the entrance from the shallowing action of the sea. He advocated the construction of a breakwater almost
parallel with the line of Bastion Point, with the addition of two small training walls and the dredging of the channel to a depth of 10 feet at low water. The material for the breakwater would be red granite from Gabo Island, conveyed by a tramway which could be retained for the subsequent conveyance of timber to the harbor. His estimate of the cost was: - Breakwater, £71,662; northern training wall, £5337; southern training wall, £7700; dredging between the training walls, £3500; dredging inside the entrance to a depth of 9 feet, £3000; contingencies, £4560; total, £95,759. As a modification of the scheme, sufficient to start with, he suggested: - Breakwater, £61,267; northern training wall, £2450; southern training wall, £5070; dredging, £6500; total, £79,054. (10).


Dorran's jetty, Mallacoota, where the proposed tramway to the Gabo Island 
causeway would commence.
Dorran's jetty, Mallacoota, looking S.W.,  October 1921. Photographer: John Henry Harvey.
State Library of Victoria Image H2009.100/500


These were the costings for a port at Mallacoota, but as The Age had noted the Public Works Department seemed to be favouring a harbour on Gabo Island. This would require firstly the causeway and also for the freight to be brought in small boat to a landing known as Dorran's, situated on the eastern side of the lake (11) and a tramway, eight miles in length -
The estimated cost of the whole of this work - tramway, causeway, pier and breakwater - is £32,000, an estimate which on the face of it seems too good to be true. The tramway itself would for a distance of 6 miles traverse sound country, but the last 2 miles would be across a series of shifting sand hummocks, so unstable that telegraph poles are not infrequently buried underneath them. Mr. Catani claims that he sand could be easily and cheaply fixed and fortified through the planting of Marram grass, to protect the tramway. So easy a disposal of what in many places has proved a difficult and expensive drawback seems like a triumph of hope over experience (12). 

The Age added if four engineers were instructed to estimate successively the cost of the proposed harbor at Gabo and its accessories, the expenditure would quickly mount to something more than £100,000 and that also to be factored into the costing was the need to remove the wreck of the steamship Easby, which lies somewhere in the waterway (13). The Australasian reported on the fate of the Easby in April 1907 - 
Messrs. James Paterson's steamer Easby struck the Skerries Reef at 3 o'clock on the morning of April 7 [1907], and had her bottom seriously damaged, the water gaining in the vessel so rapidly that she had to be beached for safety in Gabo Harbour....The Easby is a steamer of 1,498 tons gross, and was built of iron at Stockton on-Tees in 1873 for Messrs. James Pater son and Co., her present owners. Her dimensions are: Length 250ft., beam 32ft., and depth 21ft. She has been in the habit of making one trip from Melbourne to Newcastle every fortnight, and bringing about 1.800 tons of coal on each visit... The Government steamer Lady Loch proceeded to Gabo Island, and brought the deck hands to Melbourne. The Easby is submerged from the stern to the bridge. She is lying about 150ft. from the jetty used by the Lady Loch for landing stores for the light housekeeper (14). 

It is perhaps then, no surprise that with the widely varying costings of either opening up the Mallacoota Inlet or constructing a harbour on Gabo Island with a connecting causeway and  tramline that this project was not proceeded with and no doubt the Great War starting in August 1914 delivered the coup de grace to the scheme. 

Trove List - I have created a list of articles on Trove on this topic, access it here.

Footnotes
(1) The Herald, March 3, 1913, see here.
(2) The Argus, March 7, 1913, see here.
(3) The Age, March 8, 1913, see here.
(4) The Argus, March 7 1913, see here.
(5) Some reports say only three inches of rain fell. 
(6) The Herald, March 10, 1913, see here.
(7) The Argus, March 8, 1913, see here.
(8) The Argus, March 13, 1913, see here.
(9) The Age, November 7, 1913, see here.
(10) Ibid
(11) Ibid
(12) Ibid
(13) Ibid
(14) The Australasian, April  20, 1907, see here

Friday, September 2, 2022

Public Works Department Rifle Club

In April 1884 The Argus reported that -
In the scheme for the reorganisation of the defence force submitted to Parliament last session, Lieut Colonel Sargood urged that encouragement should be given to rifle clubs formed in localities where militia corps were not raised. With this object in view, the Minister of Defence has given every possible assistance in the establishment of rifle clubs by the issue of Enfield and other rifles on loan, and the supply of Martini-Henry rifles and ammunition at cost price (1). 

A club needed 20 active members of men aged over 18 years and had to receive approval from the Governor in Council. The men had to swear the following oath
I, A.B., do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the Victoria Defence Force for  a period of three years or until sooner legally discharged, dismissed, or removed, and that I will oppose and resist Her Majesty's enemies and cause Her Majesty's peace to be kept and preserved whether employed upon land or at sea, and that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against same, and that while I continue to act in the same I will to the best of my skill and knowledge faithfully discharge my duty according to law, So help me, God (2)


Regulations for Rifle Clubs, there were 16  regulations in all
Victoria Government Gazette, June 19, 1885, p. 1773     

In 1885, the Victorian Government Gazette listed the approval of over 100 different clubs (3). In early 1900, various departments in the Victorian Public Service formed their own Rifle Clubs including the Public Works Department -
The combined staffs of the Departments of Agriculture and Public Works met, under the presidency of the Secretary, Mr. Martin, on Monday evening, and discussed the desirability of forming a rifle club. The matter was taken up with much enthusiasm, and after a resolution had been passed affirming the desirability of establishing a rifle club in connection with these departments, 40 intending members handed in their names.(4)

The Public Servants were enthusiastic members of Rifle Clubs as The Argus reported 
No class in the community has shown a strong desire to join in the movement for the formation of rifle clubs than the civil servants. In connection with most of the Government departments meetings of officers and employees have been held, and preliminary steps taken to form clubs. Some of the officers are old marksmen, and have offered to instruct their fellow employees how to shoot with accuracy. There are, however, some obstacles in the way of these clubs, which will have to be removed before the civil servants can indulge in practice. The Order in Council prohibiting the formation of a club within a radius of 10 miles of an existing club will have to be rescinded and arrangements will have to be made to obtain suitable ranges (5). 

There was  rifle range at Williamstown (6) and one at Elwood (7), but as they did not operate on Sundays, it was only Saturday afternoon after work had finished that most members had the opportunity to practice where they found themselves crowded together at the ranges at Williamstown and Elwood, to the certain danger of human life (8). 

There was a proposal to establish a Rifle Rage at Fisherman's Bend. It was reported in November 1900, that Mr Catani of the Public Works department, had stated that the work could cost £3,000however progress was held up by the fact the the Defence Department would shortly be transferred to Federal control from the States, so presumably they didn't want to spend money on infrastructure that would end up in the control of the Commonwealth Government (9).

Carlo took an active role in the Public Works Department as these reports note -
From September 1901 - The Public Works Rifle Club fired their monthly match for the president's trophy and silver spoon at Williamstown on Saturday at 500 and 600 yards 7 shots at each distance. Mr J. C. Morrell won the spoon with 62. C Robertson (handicap 9), 58; Murphy (11), 57; Hewett (11), 56, and Stockfeld (2), 54, score points for the trophy. The quarterly trophies, presented by Mr Catani (vice president) and Mr Bartels have been won by Mr Morrell and Mr Thomas respectively. (10)

From March 1902 - The second annual meeting of the Public Works Rifle Club as held yesterday, there being a large muster of members present. The annual report disclosed that several members had obtained marksman's badges, and that others had shown great improvement in their shooting. The president's trophy had been won by Mr. Morrell, while Mr. Stockfield secured the bronze medal for the junior aggregate at the last Victorian Rifle Association meeting, the club thus having the honor of gaining this coveted distinction for two years in succession. Mr. D. Martin was re-elected president, and Messrs. W. Davidson and C. Catani vice presidents, Mr. J. C. Gamble captain, Mr. W. Campbell treasurer, and Mr. C. Robertson secretary. Mr. W. Davidson presented £5 for a trophy to be competed for during the season. The club held a competition at Elwood on Saturday, for a trophy presented by Mr. Ferguson, at 400 and 500 yards. (11)

In May 1902 the Public Works Department Rifle Club held  a presentation evening - 
Riflemen were again in evidence last evening, when the members and friends of the Public Works Department Rifle Club assembled at the Winter Garden Tea Rooms in The Block for the purpose of presenting the large number of handsome trophies donated by the officers of the Public Works department to the successful shots throughout the year's operations ''on the bullseye." The gathering took the form of a pleasant smoke concert; but apart from the usual list of formal toasts, no speechifying was indulged in. The president of the club. Mr D. Martin (Secretary of Public Works), presided, and at an opportune interval in the proceedings made the various presentations. Amongst the gathering were:— Mr W. Davidson, Inspector-General of Public Works; Mr C. Catani, Engineer of Roads and Bridges; Mr E. G. Duffus, Secretary for Agriculture; Mr J. Blackbourne, Federal Engineer of Defences; and Captain J. C. Gamble, secretary of the P.W.R.C. A large number of members of the departmental service contributed musical items to the enjoyable programme which was engineered by Mr T. C. Morrell, the club's crack marksman of the year. (12).

It would be interesting to know if  Carlo engaged in shooting and, if so, how good a shot he was. In February 1915, the Public Works Department Rifle Club held a meeting  to extend the scope of the Public Works and Agricultural Departments Rifle Club, to enable it to include officers of the whole State service (13). The name changed to the State Service Rifle Club and as The Argus reported in May 1915 -  
The State Public Service Rifle Club is already a strong body but within the last few days its numbers have been considerably augmented the reason of the rush to obtain membership lies in the fact that the State Ministry has authorised the construction of a miniature rifle range in the basement area space at the State public offices. The miniature range will be used mostly during the luncheon hour. Instruction will be given to the novices by the more experienced members of the club (14). The Club was still in existence in 1920, but I have no information after that. 

To give you some idea how popular Rifle Clubs were, this report was published in The Age in 1916 -
An interesting record of the part played in the war by members of the citizen forces and of members of rifle clubs, is contained in an answer given yesterday in the House of Representatives by the Minister for the Navy to a question asked by Mr. Fenton. The Minister stated that the total number of men in the citizen forces was 70,154, and of these 22,759 had now enlisted in the Australian Imperial Force for active service. The total membership of the rifle clubs of the Commonwealth was now 104,184. Of these 14,499 had enlisted for active service.  ln addition, he stated that the strength of the senior cadets was now 82,107, and of the junior cadets 47,765 (15). 
The male population of Australia in 1916 was around 2.4 million, which meant about 12% of Australian men belonged to one of the above organisations. However, given that 65%  of men at this time were aged between 15 and 65 - the 'target' age for these groups -  it actually meant that around 20% of that demographic were participants.  (16).

Trove list - I have created  a short list of articles on the Public Works Department Rifle Club and general Rifle Club articles, access it here.

Footnotes
(1) The Argus, April 8, 1884, see here.
(2) Victoria Government Gazette, June 19, 1885, p. 1773   http://gazette.slv.vic.gov.au/images/1885/V/general/60.pdf 
(3) Victoria Government Gazette http://gazette.slv.vic.gov.au/
(4) The Age, March 7, 1900, see here.
(5) The Argus, March 29, 1900, see here. The regulation that Rifle Clubs could not be within ten miles of each other seems to have been gazetted in August 1890 - Victoria Government Gazette, August 22, 1890, p. 3389  http://gazette.slv.vic.gov.au/images/1890/V/general/69.pdf
(6) Williamstown Rifle Range operated from 1878 until 1987 (Source: https://www.victorianplaces.com.au/williamstown)
(7) The Elwood Rifle Range,  known as the Elwood Rifle Butts operated from 1874 until  1909 and was located on 11 acres along Head Street. (Source: Isaac Hermann).
(8) The Argus, March 29, 1900, see here.
(9) The Argus, November 16, 1900, see here.
(10) The Argus, September 17, 1901, see here.
(11) The Argus, March 27, 1902, see here.
(12) The Herald, May 9, 1902, see here.
(13) The Herald, February 13, 1915, see here.
(14) The Argus, May 31, 1915, see here      
(15) The Age, September 15, 1916, see here.
(16) Population statistics

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Carlo and the Princes Bridge, Melbourne

Princes Bridge, over the Yarra River at Swanston Street, was officially opened on October 4, 1888. The Public Works Department engineer involved with the project was Frederick Hynes and the assistant engineer was Carlo Catani. Frederick Margarson Hynes, was born February 23, 1842 and joined the Civil Service on July 21, 1873, having previously worked for the Great Indian Peninsular Railway Company.   His official role at the time of the bridge opening was Engineer for Roads, Bridges, Harbours, Jetties and Coast Works. Frederick died at the young age of 49 on January 1, 1892 and in November of the same year, Carlo was appointed to his role (1).



The new Princes Bridge, c. 1887-1888. Photographer: Charles Rudd.
State Library of Victoria Image H2018.282/30

This post looks at the opening of the bridge as presented by articles in The Argus, The Age and The Herald.

The Argus reported on the opening -
The new Prince's bridge was formally opened for traffic at noon yesterday by Mr. J. Nimmo, M.L.A., the Commissioner of Public Works, in the presence of a large gathering of spectators, including the mayors and councillors of the municipalities which have contributed to the cost of the structure - Melbourne, South Melbourne, Prahran, St Kilda, Brighton, Malvern, Caulfield, und Moorabbin - representatives of the tramways trust, and officers of the Public Works department. The proceedings were brief and formal, the municipal representatives passed over the bridge in open carriages, after which Mr. Nimmo declared it to be open for traffic, and congratulated the majors and councillors on the successful completion of the structure, which was a credit to all concerned - the Government and the municipalities who had provided the means, the designer, the contractor, the workmen, and the officers of the Public Works department.

The Commissioner of Public Works afterwards entertained the municipal representatives and a large party at luncheon in the supper room of the Melbourne Town hall. There were about 100 present. Mr Nimmo presided, and on his right were the Mayor of Melbourne (Alderman Benjamin), Mr W. Westgarth, Mr Bent, M. L. A.,(mayor of Brighton and president of the shire of Moorabbin), Mr. D. Munro (2) (the contractor for the bridge), Mr. Munro, sen., and Mr E. G Fitzgibbon (town clerk of Melbourne), on the left of the host were the mayor of South Melbourne (Mr T. Smith), the mayor of Prahran (Mr. H. Osment), the mayor of St. Kilda (Mr S.E. Jeans), the president of the shire of Malvern (Mr A. E. Clarke), and the president of the shire of Caulfield (Mr J. Ballantyne). The engineer who designed the bridge, John Henry Grainger, of Jenkins & Grainger (3) was not present.

At the luncheon Mr Nimmo read a detailed report, which was provided to the Press, on the history of the bridge and it included the following information - The cost of the bridge is contributed as follows :- The Government, one third ; City Council of Melbourne, one third ; City of South Melbourne, £10,000 ; City of Prahran, £10,000 ; Borough of St Kilda, £10,000 ; Shire of Malvern, £2,500 ; Borough of Brighton, £2,000 ; Shire of Caulfield, £2,000 ; Shire of Moorabbin £1, 000.

The report also listed the names of the officers of the Public Works department who have been engaged on the works of the new Prince's bridge are as appended: - W. H. Steel, inspector-general ; W. Finlay, superintending officer ; F.M. Hynes, engineer ; C. Catani, assistant engineer ; J. Bell, inspector masonry, killed by falling into the coffer-dam in August 1887 (4) ; J. Bowman, inspector of masonry ; D.E. Spence, inspector of iron works ; J. Middleton, assistant Inspector of iron works.


Princes Bridge over the Yarra, undated.
State Library of Victoria Image H141992. SLV have this incorrectly dated as c. 1885.


There were a number of toasts including one to Mr Munro. The Age reported his response - 
Mr. David Munro, in replying, said the work had been well carried out, and had proved 
financially satisfactory to his firm, though he had encountered many difficulties at first. Finding a combination of quarrymen against him, he had secured quarries of his own, and finding that the Railway department had not sufficient rolling stock, he had purchased about 150 trucks from the South Australian Government and from other places outside the colony. He had found much trouble in getting granite blocks of the size he had required, and had procured them from Harcourt, beyond Castlemaine. He now found that there was a large supply of granite within 12½ miles of Melbourne and he strongly recommended its use. He thanked the company for drinking to his health, and he expressed his obligations to the officers of the Public Works department for the courtesy they had shown him, and for the assistance they had given him in carrying out the work.

Mr Munro, senior also responded to the toast. The Age reported that that he remarked that  that the work of the bridge was as well executed as it possibly could be by the hand of man. The Argus reported that he said -  
As an old mechanic he could testify to the excellence of the materials and workmanship in the construction of the new Prince's bridge. The erection of the bridge had involved the establishment of workshops extending over seven acres, and fitted with the best appliances that could possibly be secured.


Princes Bridge, Melbourne, c. 1890s.  Photographer: William H. Cooper. 
State Library of Victoria Image H90.132/5

The bulk of the reports in The Argus and The Age consisted of a political speeches and a detailed history of the planning and construction of the bridge, which took ten years. The report, is an interesting look at the process and the number of Government bodies involved with the works. This is from The Argus  - 
On the 22nd July 1878 the City Council of Melbourne passed a resolution, undertaking to be liable for one third of the cost of a new bridge, in the line of Swanston street. On the 9th August, 1878, at a deputation to the Government on the subject, the City council was informed that the Government would also contribute one-third, and provision was made on the Estimates for £350 for competitive designs of the new bridge. On the 12th Feb, 1879 the Inspector-General of Public Works recommended that the position, lines and width of the river at the site of the bridge should be decided on before the plans of the bridge were prepared. 

On the 3rd April, 1879 at the urgent request of the Mayor of Melbourne, the Minister of Public Works decided that competitive designs be invited at once, leaving the width of river and the position of bridge to the judgment of the competitors. On the 8th April, 1879, competitive designs for a new bridge, over the Yarra in line of Swanston street were invited to be sent in by the 17th June, the author of the first approved design to receive a premium of £200 and the author of the second £100.

In July 1879 a board was appointed to select the two best designs, consisting of Messrs J. H. Patterson, M L.A , Minister of Public Works (chairman) ; Joseph Storey, M. L. A., Major of Melbourne ; John Holtom, city councillor of Melbourne; John Boyd, mayor of Emerald Hill ; W. H. Steel inspector general of Public Works ; and Edward Turner, engineer of roads and bridges, Public Works department. On the 1st August, 1879, the board awarded that the designs bearing the mottos " Premier " and "Albert Edward" were the first and second respectively, and on opening the letters bearing these mottoes the first bore the names of Messrs. Jenkins and Grainger, and the second those of Messrs Temperley Edwards and A. M. Henderson (5).

On the 21st July 1879, the Inspector-general of Public Works represented that the measures for improving the river and removing the Falls reef (6) so as to give relief from floods, should precede or be included in the scheme for the new bridge, and it was decided to refer the question to a professional board, so as to have the width, depth, and lines of the river, and also the site of the new bridge definitely fixed. This board (usually termed the bridge board) was formed in May, 1880, and consisted of Messrs W. H. Steel, inspector general of Public Works (chairman) ; T. Higinbotham, engineer-in-chief of Railways ; W. Elsdon, engineer Railway department ; Joseph Brady, engineer Harbour Trust ; John Nimmo, M.L.A., ; A. K. Smith, M.L.A., ; W. C. Watts, city surveyor, Melbourne  and Sydney Smith, town surveyor, Emerald-hill ; with Mr E.G. Fitzgibbon as hon. secretary. 

On the 3rd September, 1880, the board reported, giving the definite width, depth and lines for the river, advised the removal of the reefs, fixed the site of the new bridge, and recommended that the bridge be gone on with. On the 16th September, 1880, the Minister of Public works directed that the bridge be proceeded with in accordance with the report. On the 20th October, 1880, as the engineer-in-chief of railways asked that additional width be given to Flinders-street station ground over that afforded by the lines recommended by the board, the Minister asked the board to meet and consider the question ; and on the 10th December, 1880, the board reported to the effect that if the Government considered the additional ground worth the cost that would be entailed there was no objection. On the 19th January, 1881, the new line of the north side of the river, as desired by the Railway department was therefore adopted. In the condition of competition it was provided that the author of the first design might be requested to prepare the working drawings of the bridge, and Mr. J.H. Grainger, having represented that such design was prepared by himself, applied to be entrusted with their preparation, and that was accorded to on March 10, 1881.

On the 22nd November 1881, the plans were completed by Mr. Grainger. on the 26th January, 1882, the plans were forwarded to the City Council and approved, and afterwards forwarded to Emerald-hill Council. On 19th May, 1882, the Minister of Public Works asked the board to again meet and report, as it was stated that the views of the Railway department as to the extent of ground required for station purposes had now been modified. In May 1882 Messrs R. Watson, W.H. Greene, A.J. Skene,and W. Cain were added to the board, as Messrs T. Higinbotham and A.K. Smith had died, and Mr W.Eldson had resigned. On the 30th May, 1882, the board, after ascertaining the views of the Railway department, reported and recommended that the original line of river and site of bridge referred to in the report of 3rd September 1880, should be adhered to. On the 8th August, 1882, the board again reported, fixing the gradient for the north approach to the bridge so as to give head-way for the railway traffic under the structure.

The above reports were approved, and Mr. Grainger was directed to make the necessary alterations to the plans of the bridge consequent on the change of the site. On the 18th August, 1882, at the request of the City Council, a roadway 24ft wide was provided for on the south bank of the river, and granite of bluestone was substituted for Stawell stone in the facework masonry of the bridge. Tenders were invited for the new bridge, exclusive of the south approach, on 21st March 1883, and the tenders were opened on June 7, 1883. The lowest, £128,000 was not accepted, being considered too high. On the 9th August, 1883, Mr Grainger received the balance of his commission for the preparation of the plans of the bridge, and his connection with the department and the work of the bridge then terminated.

On the 31st August, 1883, it was reported by the inspector-general that, in view of the occurrence of a flood while the piers of the new bridge were being built, it was necessary that a temporary bridge be erected and the old Prince's bridge removed, so that an outlet might be had by removing part of the roof under the old bridge. This was approved by the Minister of Public Works on October 12, 1883, and tenders were invited for the erection of a temporary timber bridge and the removal of old Prince's. These tenders were opened on November 1, 1883, and the contract was taken by Mr W. Halliday for £6,695, and was completed about August 1, 1884. The year 1884 and the early part of 1885 appear to have been occupied in negotiations between Mr. Deakin, Minister of Public Works, and the various local bodies south of the Yarra, with reference to the amounts to be contributed by them towards the remaining one-third of the cost of the bridge. 

It was decided that when fresh tenders were invited the work should include the south embankment, and the widening and deepening of the rivers adjacent to the bridge. The preparation of the plans of the south embankment, the widening and deepening of the rivers, and the modifications of the plans of the bridge rendered necessary by the cable tramway passing over it, were now entrusted to Mr. F.M. Hynes, C.E., of the Public Works department. On the 29th May, 1885, tenders for the new bridge were invited, and the tenders were opened on the 27th August 1885, the lowest being that of Mr. David Munro for £136,998. The contract was signed on November 16, 1885.


Reports of the opening - The Argus, October 5, 1888, see here; The Age,  October 5, 1888, see here and the Herald October 4, 1888, see here.

Some of the people involved with the project and other footnotes
(1)  Frederick Hynes - Statistical Register of the Colony of Victoria, 1890, see here and The Argus, January 2, 1892, see here

'
Carlo appointed Engineer for Roads, Bridges, Harbors, Jetties and Coast works to
replace the late Frederick Hynes.
Victoria Government Gazette November 25, 1892, p. 4340.

(2) Contractor - David Munro (1844-1898). Read his Australian Dictionary of Biography entry, by Michael Cannon, here.
(3) Bridge designer - John Harry Grainger (1854-1917) - read his Victorian Collections story, here. the story also has images of the bridge design and decoration. Jenkins and Grainger - J. S. Jenkins - he was an architect and surveyor and in partnership with Grainger for a time, but the Princes Bridge design is considered to be Graingers. John Shanks Jenkins  died March 19, 1913 aged 78 at his home 546 Swan Street, Richmond. An obituary said that he was one of the oldest municipal engineers in Victoria and was a councillor and ex-Mayor of Richmond.  His daughter, Constance, was an artist - read about her, here. [Source - death notice The Argus, March 22 1913 see here; obituary The Argus, March 22, 1913, see here.]
(4) John Bell - masonry inspector -  the man who fell into the coffer dam. He sadly died on August 17, 1887 two days after the fall. Mr Bell, aged 54,  had been the inspector of government works at Queenscliffe and his obituary said that his happy genial manner made him many friends.  [Source - Obituary - Queenscliffe Sentinel, August 20 1887, see here; death notice - The Argus, August 18, 1887, see here]
(5) Temperley, Edwards and A. M. Henderson - the runners-up in the design competition. They are listed as - J. R. Temperley, George H. Edwards and A.M. Henderson - in the Weekly Times August 9, 1879, see here.  
John Ridley Temperley. He was a mechanical and hydraulic engineer and joined up with George Edwards in 1879. In 1885 involved with a  friend in the invention of the Brennan torpedo; and in 1898 granted a patent for  Improvements in apparatus for raising, lowering, and conveying for transporting loads. [Kyneton Observer, July 17, 1879, see here; Geelong Advertiser, June 5 1885, see here; Australasian August 13, 1887, see here; Australian Town & Country Journal, August 6 1898, see here.]
George H. Edwards, architect and surveyor.  The Kyneton Observer article referred to above notes - We learn that Mr Geo. H. Edwards C. E. and Architect, late of Kyneton, has joined Mr J. R. Temperley, C. E. also of Kyneton, in his business in Melbourne. The firm is now practising under the style of Temperley and Edwards, Architects, Engineers, and Surveyors, at their new offices, Colonial Chambers, Collins-street west, Melbourne. Mr Edwards is well known here as an architect, and also in connection with the great iron bridge across the River Murray, at Echuca, having executed the design and superintended its erection under Mr W. B. Greene, C. E. We understand Mr Edwards has had extensive experience as architect and engineer, in Europe and the colonies, and has earned a reputation for good and economical instruction. Mr Temperley has for some years been successful as a mechanical and hydraulic engineer, and has recently been engaged in carrying out extensions of water supply, &c., at Echuca and elsewhere. Edwards sued the Richmond Council in 1883 over money he said he was owed for professional services in regard to Richmond Park bridge (see here
Anketell Matthew Henderson, C.E., F.R.V.I.A.,  lecturer of Architecture at Melbourne University and President of the Royal Victorian Institute of Architects.  He died November 15, 1922, aged 69.  Read his obituary in The Argus November 16, 1922, here.
(6) Falls Reef was located in the Yarra River, near Queens Bridge (end of Market Street). They were removed in 1883 - 1885, under the advice of Sir John Coode. See articles in The Argus of May 24, 1883, here and December 3, 1884, here.

Saturday, June 11, 2022

Carlo gives evidence at the Railways Standing Committee regarding the San Remo Pier

The Age of September 25 1901 published this report under the headline - Westernport Coalfields - proposed railway and shipping facilities -
The Railways Standing Committee yesterday examined Mr. C. Catani, engineer for ports and harbors in the Public Works department, with reference to the development of the Cape Paterson and Kilcunda coal fields by the proposed Bass Valley railway and shipping facilities at Westernport. Mr. Catani said that wharfage at San Remo to accommodate vessels drawing eighteen feet could be provided at a cost of £3000, which would dispense with the necessity of spending £500, as proposed, to suit the existing traffic. Vessels could come in by the eastern entrance between Phillip Island and the mainland, or by the western passage. If it was necessary to have a port for vessels drawing up to 30 feet of water that depth could be found in the channel on the west side of Phillip Island, between French Island and Phillip Island, within a mile of Settlement Point and Corinella on the mainland. To construct from Settlement Point a pier a mile long, so as to reach deep water, would cost £25,000
(1).  The cheapest method of providing for immediate requirements would be to carry out the works at San Remo. To provide accommodation for ships by dredging instead of making a pier would be very costly owing to the basaltic formation of the country. To make a channel through the rock would entail an expenditure of about £800,000 per mile. There was a deep channel from Cowes to within a certain distance of Settlement Point (2).

San Remo Harbour, c. 1910
Phillip Island from San Remo Harbour. State Library of Victoria Image H93.272/3

Carlo Catani's views were confirmed by a local expert  Captain Livingstone, of the steamer Lady Loch, stated that vessels drawing 16 feet of water could at the present time proceed up the channel on the east side of Phillip Island, between Cape Wollomai and San Remo, to the latter place, and after loading with coal, turn round return to the ocean by that channel. He said that a steamer of the ordinary type could at present proceed to San Remo, and take on board about 1500 tons of coal, but that specially built vessels, having a shallow draught could carry a much larger quantity than that. It would, however, be necessary to build vessels of a special type for that trade if large carrying capacity was desired. He also stated that there was a deep water channel on the west and north side of Phillip Island, up to within three quarters of a mile of Settlement Point on the mainland. The largest vessel in the world could navigate that channel with safety, but the drawback against using that channel was the long length of pier which would have to be constructed at Settlement Point to reach the deep water (3).

Coal was found at Kilcunda in 1865, but it wasn't until 1870 that the Western Port Coal Mining Company began mining operations. The coal was initially carted by bullock teams to San Remo (originally called Griffiths Point (4)). The roads soon became impassable due to this heavy traffic and a horse tramway was constructed in 1874,  at a cost of £12,700. The Company also spent £720 constructing  a jetty at San Remo. By early 1875, over 5000 tons of coal had been shipped from Griffiths Point to Melbourne. However,  this tramway soon proved to be inadequate as the rails were made of wood and not iron, and so after an influx of capital,  in 1879 the Company replaced the rails  in iron, purchased a steam loco from Tasmania, enlarged the jetty and improved the loading facilities.  The Company continued operations until 1888. By 1899, all steel rails on the haulage route had been removed (5).


The Western Port Coal Company Tramway from the Kilcunda Coal Mines to San Remo
is shown on this map.
Sketch plan of proposed Bass Valley, Powlett River, and San Remo railway by John Collins. SLV have this dated as 1907(?). State Library of Victoria. See the entire map here http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/115280

Joseph White in his One Hundred Years of History (6) books lists over ten other coal mining leases in the Bass Kilcunda region from the mid 1890s to 1910 most of which were relinquished when it was found that the coal fields could be very irregular. It seems for this reason that the Bass Valley Railway and the expanded shipping facilities at San Remo or Settlement Point, as outlined by Carlo Catani in his evidence to the Railways Standing Committee, did not go ahead.


Footnotes
(1) I have found six reports of Carlo's evidence and four say it would cost £25,000 and the other two, £35,000. See the reports in my Trove list, here.
(2) The Age, September 25, 1901, see here.
(3) Western Port Times September 27, 1901, see here.
(4) White, Joseph One hundred years of History: Shire of Phillip Island & Woolamai 1875- 1928, Shire of Bass 1928-1975 (Shires of Bass and Phillip Island, 1974), p. 46. Griffiths Point changed to San Remo in 1888.
(5) This information comes from Joseph White, op. cit. pp 58-61.  It also comes from Jack Vines Coal Mining Heritage Study in Victoria (Heritage Council of Victoria 2008). They differ slightly in some of the dates. You can read Jack Vines' study here   https://www.heritage.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/513085/Coal-mining-heritage-study-in-Victoria-Vines-2008.pdf
(6) White, op. cit p. 60

Sunday, May 8, 2022

Carlo and the proposal to designate Laverton as the noxious trades area in 1917

This post  looks at the history of Laverton as the potential site of a noxious trades area. In 1917, Carlo Catani was invited to be on the panel of  three experts of high standing, to investigate and report on this matter (1).  Laverton, advertised as a new and model suburb, was sub-divided in 1886, a project of the Federal Investment Company of Australasia. The land sales were handled by Staples, Wise & Co and promoted by the publication of  a booklet Laverton, the new and model suburb : with a short history of Melbourne from its foundation to the present time,  written by C.R. Staples of the Estate Agents firm (2).


Laverton, the new and model suburb: with a short history of Melbourne from its 
foundation to the present time by C.R. Staples.
Digitised at the State Library of Victoria http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/119810

The booklet had a short history of Melbourne and then  a description of  Laverton - 
Laverton, the latest-born suburb of Melbourne, is situate on the main Geelong and Ballarat Railway, being the first station beyond Newport, from which by train it is only ten minutes journey. The new workshops at Newport, tenders for which have lately been accepted, will, when complete, employ some 3000 workmen all the year round, and as consequence land suitable for building purposes within easy distance must increase in value. Laverton has been laid out by the well-known surveyors, Messrs. Bruford and Braim, of 67 Chancery Lane, Melbourne, upon the most improved system, the owners taking pride in the endeavour to make it really model suburb. All the streets are sixty-six feet wide, reserves for public buildings have been set aside, and an area of over twenty-five acres has been dedicated to the inhabitants for park and recreation reserves. 

The site of Laverton is an admirable one, commanding extensive views in all directions, comprising the Bay with its shipping, the Dandenong Ranges, Plenty Ranges, Mount Macedon, and the You Yangs in fact, every prominent landmark within radius of fully thirty miles is plainly visible. The land itself is unsurpassed in the district, and has been known for years as one of the richest spots in the locality, and the owners guarantee that every allotment is suitable, without the expenditure of shilling, for the immediate erection of dwellings, it having sufficient elevation for drainage without any broken ground, cliffs, or other impediments. 

The price and terms upon which it is offered to the public are unequalled in the history of land sales, and have been arranged so that everyone may have chance of securing one or more allotments, and the owners, not grasping at every attainable shilling, offer the land at an absurdly low figure, leaving the unearned increment for the benefit of purchasers.....When it is considered that land at Caulfield, Surrey Hills, Brighton, and other older settlements practically as distant from Melbourne is worth from £2 to £10 per foot, the chance which is now offered of obtaining profitable investment must be apparent to all. The time occupied by the train in bringing passengers from Caulfield to Melbourne is twenty-six minutes, from Surrey Hills thirty-five minutes, from Brighton thirty-three minutes, from Williamstown thirty minutes, from Oakleigh thirty-seven minutes, whilst from Laverton it is about twenty-eight minutes. The Railway Station is in the centre of the northern boundary of the town, and, as already stated, the Newport workshops can be reached in about ten minutes (3)


Laverton township - complete plan for private sale by Staples, Wise and Co.
Digitised at the State Library of Victoria http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/115262

In spite of the promotional booklet and attractive adverting posters the new and model suburb seemed to be slow to take off. In 1891 there were 33 dwellings housing a population of 156 and in 1901, 37 dwellings and  a population of 155. Thirty years later, 1921 the population was still only 195 (4). 

In 1917,  there was agitation to have a noxious trades area established and Laverton was suggested. Noxious trades included abattoirs, meat works and other businesses which used the by-products of the slaughtering process such as the blood, bones, fat, hair, wool, hooves, and the offal; the tanneries, cattle yards, fellmongers and wool washers.

Historian Dr John Lack (5) gives us this background to the noxious trades industry - Agitation against river and air pollution resulted in the Yarra Pollution Act (1855) and the discouragement of noxious trades above and opposite the city. Over time the trades tended to gravitate to the lower Yarra at Fishermans Bend and Yarraville, to Stony Creek and to the Maribyrnong at Flemington and Footscray, encouraged by the Sandridge (Port Melbourne), Footscray and Melbourne municipal councils. Their smells made the river approach to Melbourne notorious, and together with household drainage and nightsoil earned Melbourne the appellation 'Marvellous Smelbourne' (as opposed to Marvellous Melbourne). High levels of meat consumption, the rejection of offal except in hard times, and low levels of development and investment in preventative technology, together with the hot Australian summer, may have made pollution from noxious trades worse than in Britain.

West Melbourne ('Worst Smelbourne' or 'Worst Smelldom') was judged to be even worse, and the glue works, tanneries and bone mills of Footscray, through which the western and northern railway lines passed, gave that suburb a reputation as the Cologne of the Antipodes. The 1887-88 Royal Commission on the Sanitation of Melbourne recommended effective controls on pollution, but the sewering of the City Abattoirs at Flemington and the noxious trades along the Maribyrnong came only in the early 1900s, and it tended to anchor existing industries and attract others, including the Angliss Meatworks. In the long depression of the 1890s and early 1900s, councils in inner working-class Melbourne were reluctant to pressure industrialists to improve or move, and men like James Cuming and William Angliss of Footscray were powerful figures. New traders sprang up on old licences at Braybrook, discharging their wastes to the Maribyrnong River which barely flowed in summer (6). 

It was thus no wonder that some municipalities wanted to create a separate noxious trades industry and a municipal conference, convened by the City of Hawthorn, was held  in August 1917 on this matter as The Herald reported on August 22, 1917 (7)
Motions carried at a municipal conference convened by the Hawthorn Council, in favor of the creation of a special noxious trades area, were placed today before Mr D. M'Leod, Minister for Health, who, in his reply to the deputation, said that the Government had arranged for the appointment of three engineers of high qualification to report on the suitability of Laverton as a special site. Cr S. Pynor, Mayor of Essendon, Cr E. C. Rigby, of Hawthorn, and Cr A. C. Westley, of Oakleigh, were the principal speakers in urging that the Minister should remove the noxious trades from the residential part of the metropolis.

Mr M'Leod, in the course of his reply, said that an officer of the Department of Public Health had prepared a valuable report as to the suitability of Laverton as a site for noxious trades, but before the heavy expenditure involved was undertaken Mr C. Catani, formerly Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department, and probably Mr G. Kermode, the present Chief Engineer, and Mr W. Calder, the chairman of the Country Roads Board, would be asked to make an inspection of Laverton, which could be sewered and readily furnished with the necessary water supply and other essentials. More important still, there was a bed of brown coal, up to 47 feet in thickness, passing under the site. Electricity could be provided for power at a cheap rate, and as the bay was close at hand products could be shipped by sea. "If the Laverton scheme can be carried out," continued the Minister, "it would be unwise to have anything to do with a piecemeal scheme. The Government agrees, while it is anxious to encourage the establishment of industries in Victoria, that noxious trades should be removed from the residential area"
(8). 

Cr Rigby spoke at the conference of the impact that government inertia had on this industry - The fear of removal had been having a retarding effect on them for some time, and had been keeping them back so far as improvements and extensions were concerned. Some of the structures had been up for 50 years and were dilapidated beyond repair. The municipalities did not feel strong or harsh enough to insist that they should be pulled down altogether or entirely remodelled in view of the hope and indeed the promise of the Government— that they would be removed outside the residential areas. They had no hot-headed desire to injure the trades concerned (9)


The occupants of Laverton from the 1925 Sands & McDougall's Directory of Victoria.
It was still very much a  country town
State Library of Victoria collection.


The occupants of Laverton from the 1935 Sands & McDougall's Directory of Victoria. 
Click on image to enlarge. State Library of Victoria collection.


Carlo Catani, George Kermode (1873-1941) his replacement at the Public Works Department and William Calder (1860-1928) of the Country Roads Board were officially appointed on September 5, 1917 to inquire into and report on the suitability of Laverton as a site for noxious trades (10). The Health Minister, Mr McLeod was reported as saying that the board is not likely to take long over its report (11).  One newspaper report on the aforementioned noxious trade conference convened by the City of Hawthorn noted that Mr. Catani has given evidence that Laverton was suitable in every way - for water, rail and road transport, and situation (12)so you would assume that the report would have been in favour of Laverton being the location for noxious trades. However, the only information I have on the findings of the panel is from a letter Mr Henry Keiley of Brougham Street, Kew (13) wrote to The Herald  in July 1918 regarding the unrecognised possibilities of the textile industry in Australia and he said that a board of engineering experts-Messrs W. Calder, C. Catani and another were appointed to report at once on the suitability of Laverton as a noxious trade area. The board never reported on it; the matter is shelved (14). 

This was not the first time that this matter had been shelved. Mr Keiley had written another letter to The Herald in August 1917, where he said ...with regard to the noxious trades and the proposed site at Laverton. The Board appointed six or seven years ago drew up a report which, like many similar reports, was never acted on, as the Government would have had to pay heavy compensation to the various businesses affected (15). 

Yet another report was commissioned on the suitability of Laverton in January 1919. The Age reported that it is understood that Messrs. W. Davidson (late Inspector-General for Public Works), J. M. Reed (late Secretary for Lands) and E. H. Ballard (Chief Engineer for Railway Works and Ways), who were appointed a board to report on the technical practicability of the Laverton site for a concentration of noxious trades, are finding no insuperable difficulties, and their report, which is believed to be of a favorable character, will be in the hands of the Government very shortly (16). 

The Age report continued on an optimistic note - 
The definite approval of the Laverton site by the Government, and the presumably early commencement of the work of concentrating the noxious trades there will, it is stated, have a revolutionary effect upon the conduct of many of the industries concerned. Having uncertain tenures, owners of noxious works within the metropolis have not, in the main, attempted to erect buildings of a really substantial nature, suitable to the trade. Moreover, in many of the works up to date machinery, designed for the elimination of the personal factor in the more objectionable features of the trades and the reduction of the nuisance to the neighborhood, has been conservatively neglected. With the concentration of the trades at Laverton these undesirable features will, it is stated, have to disappear (17).

The Age also addressed the issue of the need for workers to move to Laverton as it 
follows that the concentration of noxious trades at Laverton will be accompanied by the growth of a not inconsiderable township there, at whose door the concentration of every noxious trade now in Melbourne, under present offensive conditions, would be intolerable. However, it is authoritatively stated that the measures which will be insisted upon to modernise the noxious trades, once they are concentrated at Laverton, will minimise the nuisances to an extent hardly conceivable by the unfortunate inhabitants who happen to be living alongside them at present. The Laverton scheme will provide for the erection of a model township, which will be at some little distance from the site of the noxious works, and in a direction away from the prevailing wind. Here, after his day's work in the noxious factory, the worker will while away his evening hours in his generous garden plot — amidst the roses, the geraniums and the sweet peas— and forget. Thus, paradoxically, optimists believe that the future noxious trades town of Laverton will become one of the sweetest and most beautiful towns in the Commonwealth. It is all, it is claimed, merely a matter of science and supervision (18). 

This was of course, the second plan for the township of  Laverton - as we saw, the 1886 land sales described the future town as  a new and model suburb, and in the 1919 scheme as a model township. However, once again the plan to move the noxious industries to Laverton, did not happen. As Dr John Lack writes -
During the 1920s there was agitation for the removal of the City Abattoirs and the noxious trades to a special outer site in either Braybrook or Werribee shire, and several inquiries were held. But vested interests, wary of the distances involved, the cost of new works, and the imposition of controls, succeeded in postponing any action. Eventually, after World War II the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works designated a noxious trades zone at Laverton North, and today the pungent odour of industry can sometimes be detected by commuters on the Western Ring Road. Closures of obsolete large abattoirs at Flemington, Footscray and Newport, the growth of country killing, the decline in the local tanning industry, the growth in the export of by-products, improvements in transport, storage and processing, and the substitution of synthetics for natural products have largely eliminated noxious trades odours from Melbourne's suburbs (19). 

Carlo's involvement with the decision to designate Laverton as a noxious trades area came after his retirement as Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department, but it is a testament to the esteem in which he was held that he was invited to be on the panel of  three experts of high standing, as The Age described it (20).  The fact that it seems that his panel did not make a report at the time was just symptomatic of the Governments longstanding inaction in this area.

Trove list - I have created  a list of articles relating to Laverton and the plan to turn it designate it the noxious trades area in 1917 and 1919, access it here.

Footnotes
(1) The Age, August 23, 1917, see here.
(2) Laverton, the new and model suburb: with a short history of Melbourne from its
foundation to the present tim
e by C.R. Staples. Digitised at the State Library of Victoria http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/119810
(3) Ibid
(4) Population figures - Lost and Almost Forgotten Towns of Colonial Victoria: a comprehensive analysis of Census Results for Victoria 1841-1901 by Angus B. Watson (The Author, 2003) and Victorian Places https://www.victorianplaces.com.au/laverton
(5) Dr  John Lack author of A history of Footscray (Hargreen Publishing, 1991) and other works on Footscray.
(7) The Herald, August 22 1917, see here.
(8) Ibid
(9) The Age, August 23, 1917, see here.
(10) The Herald, September 5, 1917, see here.
(11) Ibid
(12) Footscray Advertiser, August 4, 1917, see here.
(13) Henry Loftus Keiley, listed in the Electoral Rolls as a wool classer. He was a regular letter writer to the newspapers in the 1910s, early 1920s.  His father, also called Henry, was the music critic at The Argus for twenty years (The Age, December 30, 1933, see here).
(14) The Herald, July 13, 1918, see here.
(15) The Herald, August 14, 1917, see here.
(16) The Age, January 14, 1919, see here.
(17) Ibid
(18) Ibid
(20) The Age, August 23, 1917, see here.